Martin Green
Testing desk

Martin Green

Senior Slots Editor

Martin has covered UK slot releases since 2014 and looks at the studio behind a game as closely as the game itself. He specialises in high-volatility and feature-buy titles, where the marketing and the maths tend to diverge most, and tracks how the likes of Nolimit City, Hacksaw Gaming, Pragmatic Play and Play'n GO evolve their formats. His question on every review is simple: does this game do what it claims, and is it worth your time and money.

Areas I focus on

  • Studio-by-studio coverage: Nolimit City, Hacksaw, Pragmatic Play, Play'n GO
  • High-volatility and feature-buy slots, where hype and maths diverge
  • Whether a release actually does what its marketing claims
How I test

I play the release, study the studio behind it, and ask one thing: does this game do what it claims, and is it worth your time and money.

Reviews by Martin Green

54 comparisons tested and signed by Martin Green.

RTP 96.45% Medium volatility Read the comparison → RTP 95.43% High volatility Read the comparison → RTP 99% High volatility Read the comparison → RTP 96.07% High volatility Read the comparison → RTP 94.93% Medium volatility Read the comparison → RTP 96.15% Medium volatility Read the comparison → RTP 96.51% High volatility Read the comparison → RTP 96.56% High volatility Read the comparison → RTP 96.53% Medium volatility Read the comparison → RTP 96.01% Medium volatility Read the comparison → RTP 96.19% High volatility Read the comparison → RTP 96.50% Medium volatility Read the comparison → RTP 96.06% High volatility Read the comparison → RTP 96.51% High volatility Read the comparison → RTP 96.71% Very high volatility Read the comparison → RTP 96.43% High volatility Read the comparison → RTP 95.91% Low to medium volatility Read the comparison → RTP 96.06% High volatility Read the comparison → RTP 96.53% High volatility Read the comparison → RTP 95.32% Medium volatility Read the comparison → RTP 94.08% Medium-high volatility Read the comparison → RTP 96.10% High volatility Read the comparison → RTP 96.01% High volatility Read the comparison → RTP 95.97% Medium to high volatility Read the comparison → RTP 93.17% to 95.88% High volatility Read the comparison → RTP 96.18% Medium volatility Read the comparison → RTP 94.94% Low to medium volatility Read the comparison → RTP 96.03% High volatility Read the comparison → RTP 96.28% High volatility Read the comparison → RTP 96.55% Medium-high volatility Read the comparison → RTP 96.04% High volatility Read the comparison → RTP 96.18% Medium volatility Read the comparison → RTP 96% Medium-high volatility Read the comparison → RTP 96.45% High volatility Read the comparison → RTP 96.09% Extreme volatility Read the comparison → RTP 96.4% Very volatile volatility Read the comparison → RTP 96.1% Highly volatile volatility Read the comparison → RTP 96.38% High volatility Read the comparison → RTP 95.64% to 96.52% Very high volatility Read the comparison → RTP 96.5% High volatility Read the comparison → RTP 96.69% Medium volatility Read the comparison → RTP 96.50% Medium volatility Read the comparison → RTP 96.50% High volatility Read the comparison → RTP 95.5 per cent High volatility Read the comparison → RTP 96.5% Medium volatility Read the comparison → RTP 96.50% High volatility Read the comparison → RTP 96.51% High volatility Read the comparison → RTP 96.5% High volatility Read the comparison → RTP 96.21% High volatility Read the comparison → RTP 96.56% High volatility Read the comparison → RTP 96.71% Very high volatility Read the comparison → RTP 96.53% Very high volatility Read the comparison → RTP 96.55% High volatility Read the comparison → RTP 96.52% High volatility Read the comparison →